A paperless society, how close are we?

About seventeen years ago I attended a seminar in Manchester at which the speaker predicted that a paperless society will emerge in twenty year’s time. We are three years away from the date and I wonder whether we are any closer to the prediction. Last week I was in London with Pal (a work colleague) to attend an HEA meeting at the London Knowledge Lab.  Before the meeting, we were emailed directions to the venue and we made sure we had a printed copy of the information before we set off from Leicester. At London Kings Cross we followed the instructions:

“From Kings cross, take the Piccadilly line south bound to Russell square, come out of the station and turn right, pass the Brunswick centre on your left and carry on and turn, carry on and turn, and turn and carry on and on and on and on…”

After the meeting, and based on my suggestion, we ignored the set of instructions sent to us, made an educated guess, and ventured in a direction we were convinced will take us back to the Kings Cross station. To verify that we were heading in the right directions, we stopped at a point and spoke to a couple who looked more like tourists than Londoners. After a few manoeuvres we made it to Kings Cross, hurray!!!

Back home I wondered why the direction to the venue of the meeting was not made available as a podcast for download, both for our immediate and future use and also considering the fact that the meeting was about podcasting for learning. The alternative would have been to have in our possession the revolutionary I-Phone with GPS functionality and maps.

Despite much talk about the exponential growth in computing power, the age of information technology, the age of digital revolution etc, characterised by the ability to access and transfer information freely, it appears many of us academics, and the institutions and organisations we belong to still limit our use of technology to aspects of our lives e.g. learning, teaching, researching, communicating  whilst  remaining ultra-conservative in other areas of our lives e.g. travelling, shopping etc. Clinging to, and tenaciously adhering to old ways of doing things, as pertained in the pre-technology era, instead of embracing the change and improvement technology can make in all areas of our lives has profound implications for how we view and change the future. From the point of view of “learning transition”, thinking digital and digital wisdom still remains a challenge in many aspects of our non-academic lives. Perspectives may differ on “initiation ceremonies” into digital modes of thinking, but the question still remains; how close are we to crossing the paperless chasm?

Sahm Nikoi; 31 March 2009.

Podcasting for reflective learning

Anguelina, a PhD student from the University of Ultrecht, Netherlands visited BDRA last week. Her research is on podcasting to support students’ reflections. Her research was conducted with a group of students studying a psychology course. The students were divided into two control groups. Students in one control group were provided with a podcast a day before their face-to-face lecture. In the podcast, the professor asked a couple of academic questions for students to think about before coming to the face-to-face lecture. Students in another control group were not given access to the podcasts.

Students who listened to the podcasts were evaluated through whether the questions asked in a podcast before a lecture stimulated them to re-consider what they had known. In the end of a lecture, the students were tested with the same academic questions asked in the podcast and examined by whether their answers to those questions were any deeper or richer than the answers given by the students who did not have access to the podcast.

Anguelina’s research reminded me of another two studies of using podcasting to promote students’ reflective learning. Mark J.W. Lee, an early and active podcasting practitioner in Australia investigated the potential of podcasting for delivering students’ oral presentations and of blogging for facilitating peer and self-evaluation for assessment purposes. Students were asked to record their presentations in MP3 format for podcasting, then used a collaborative blog to critically reflect on their work and on feedback from classmates.

Dick Ng’ ambi wrote a chapter on podcasting for reflective learning in the book ‘Podcasting for learning in Universities’. In this chapter, he introduced podcasting for mediating reflective practice into a South African on-campus postgraduate course in Information Technology. Students were asked to make presentations in a group. Their oral presentations, questions asked by peers, and their responses to the questions were recorded and made available as podcasts. Students were then asked to listen to the podcasts and individually reflect on questions asked by peers, and wrote reflective essays for assessment purposes.

Mark’s and Dick’s studies showed how podcasting can enable reflection to take place by giving students the opportunity to come back to their original presentations, allowing them time and space to think over questions asked by peers. It also showed how students can learn from peers by taking in their insightful ideas and the way how peers handled the questions.

The difference in the three approaches is, Anguelina’s study used lecturer-created podcasts, whereas Mark and Dick evaluated student-created podcasts.

Ming Nie,  28 March 2009.

Academics in the public sphere: A gentle wake-up call

This post will look at two key and current issues to do with online social networks, assess what impacts such developments have on the academic community, and question why such developments are increasingly met with resounding silence from academics.

Let’s start off with the issues. First, the recently emerging trends of changing demographics of social networks; and second, the UK government’s proposal to monitor social networks for possible terrorist or ‘anti-social’ activities.

Recent research into Facebook’s membership reveals that the number of Americans over the ages of 35, 45, and 55 is rapidly growing. Over the last 2 months alone, the number of people over 35 joining Facebook has nearly doubled. It would not be extrapolating too far to suggest that as a result, more academic practitioners (in the age-group 35 to 55, and over) are also increasingly participating in social networks.

Though this data-set looks only at American users, the changing demographics on any established social network presents a challenge for developers and marketers to think about how to best serve/target such groups of new users, wherever in the world they might be.

In the same vein, such shifting demographics presents renewed possibilities too – for academic institutions and employers providing lifelong or work-based learning opportunities – to tap into this trend and perhaps enhance what they offer and how they offer it.

Yet a naysayer would suggest that learners do really want to keep their work and social lives separate and that they do not want to be always available to their lecturers or bombarded with academic information on their social networks. Employers, on the other hand, are so aghast at the so called ‘wastage’ of £130 million per day that they are rushing to ban staff from logging on to social networks.

Considering that social networks are here to stay and that learner-preference for technology is rapidly changing, does a middle ground exist – which could benefit both sides? As well as it might, most academics do not seem prepared to venture an informed opinion on such matters without resorting to the clichés of ‘it needs further investigation’ or ‘we need more funding to look into it’.

Have we stopped seeing what is staring us in the face? Or are we too caught up in the ivory towers of our disciplinary specifics to take cognizance of changing technological times and react to it? The silence of informed voices from members of the academic community on issues of current import is indeed deafening. Have academics and public intellectuals ceded the forum for ideas and debate to the state and to those willing to campaign for/against the state?  

Most of us watched, heard, read and surfed in silence while the media was abuzz with alarm earlier this week, over the UK Government’s plans to monitor all conversations on social networking sites – including Facebook, MySpace, Bebo and Twitter as well as internet calls on Skype – in an attempt to crackdown on terror.

The government argues that in view of a clear and present terrorist threat, there is a need to monitor all manner of communication technologies, which terrorists – like the rest of us – have easy and unbridled access too.

But when the justification for this is provided by organizations like the Federation of American Scientists on the lines of – “Twitter has also become a social activism tool for socialists, human rights groups, communists, vegetarians, anarchists, religious communities, atheists, political enthusiasts, hacktivists and others to communicate with each other and to send messages to broader audiences” – it begins to infringe on freedoms as we know it.

Campaigners like Shami Chakrabarti, director of the human rights group Liberty, claim that the widespread use of social networking websites “highlights the enormity of government ambitions for the surveillance of the entire population … Technological development is used as an excuse for centralized snooping of a kind that ought never to be acceptable in the oldest unbroken democracy on earth.”

The academic community is still considered a part of the public sphere where opinions, however contrarian and in opposition to the mainstream, can be freely aired in the spirit of debate, and dissention is not frowned upon. Yet within it there is hesitancy and inertia in embracing the tools of online communication that facilitate such debate and dissention in ways that have not been tried before.

There very few academics ready to raise voices against such proposals anymore – not only via formal and distilled communication channels like the mass media, but not even on the more informal and opinionated routes like the ‘blogsphere’. 

If academia is to remain the custodian and nurturer of ideas, we need to make our voices heard, not just on the matters that impact us directly but also on issues that affect the wider community. And we need to do this by stepping beyond our usual routes of dissemination, by embracing the technologies that give us newer audiences and platforms, which are perhaps more questioning and resistant, but also in need of informed opinion that enriches the debate.

This is not a call to arms.

It is a lament for what we are missing out on and a wake up call that we might just want to heed before the opportunity passes us by.

Over to you!

 

- Jaideep Mukherjee, 27 March 2009

Ja well no fine

As I’m relatively new to the BDRA, I will use this post to tell you a little bit about myself. I’m from South Africa, which means that I say ‘Ja’ (pronounced ‘Ya’) rather a lot. (South Africans almost never say ‘Yes’, although we’re known to say ‘Yeeees’ when adding special emphasis to the affirmative.) I also come from that generation of South Africans whose vocabulary irritatingly includes the phrase ‘Ja well no fine!’, which means roughly the same as the Indian head nod (I learnt this by spending most of last year in India and frequently getting into trouble for misinterpreting this vital but cryptic bit of body language) – which, depending on context and accompanying clues such as a smile or a twinkle in the eye, can mean yes, no or maybe. (And in India, a twinkle in the eye can just as easily mean ‘No’ as it can ‘Yes’, as if things weren’t confusing enough already.) ‘Ja well no fine’ has the added advantage though, that it can stand in for ‘Well then!’ or ‘Oh!’ or any other English conversation filler that you might use when you don’t know what else to say. I’m pretty sure it was the writer Robin Malan, better known in South Africa by the phonetically spelt version of his name, Rawbone Malong, who popularized the phrase in the early seventies with the publication of his book Ah Big Yaws? A Guard to Sow Theffricun Innglissh, which, roughly translated into standard English, means ‘I beg your pardon? A Guide to South African English’, and which instantly became the definitive, if merciless, guide to white South African English pronunciation – even being used as a reference by the BBC’s drama department at the time.

Of course things have changed since then, and so-called Black English has taken its rightful place in the annals of our nation’s linguistic history. There was that great story some years back, of how Nelson Mandela once asked a member of the South African Airways crew for the black pepper, and she returned with that day’s edition of The Sowetan newspaper. (Those were the days when our national carrier crew’s fame revolved around more innocent things than facilitating South Africa’s international trade in dagga. Um, ja well no fine…)

That whole, rambling preamble was just to say that my interest in joining the BDRA’s DUCKLING team, specifically to work with the School of Education on the MA in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, has a few of its roots in my lifelong interest in regional dialects and world languages, living and dead. Apart from laughing deliriously at Malan’s exquisitely accurate transcription of our local idioms in my teens, I also studied Latin at school (while my friends were doing more sensible subjects like Science or Accountancy), after which I learnt a bizarre mixture of German, Swiss German and French on an exchange student year in Switzerland, which only my host family, in particular my ‘Mami’, who expended many hours teaching me her native French through the medium of our shared but totally butchered version of Swiss German, could ever fully understand.

Back in South Africa, I immersed myself in the anti-apartheid struggle in the eighties, majoring in Zulu while engaging in the deliberately subversive project of teaching literacy to black adults who had been denied an education by the evil Verwoerdian policies established in the fifties, all the while losing friends and colleagues for various periods of time to detention without trial, solitary confinement and other forms of institutional abuse in the political cauldron that was South Africa at the time. My postgraduate studies in Applied Linguistics provided welcome light relief.

A year in Spain in the early nineties, just before South Africa was due to undergo its peaceful transition to democracy (although we all feared that the Bothas and De Klerks were going to lead us into the bloodiest of civil wars) helped to calm my frantic spirit, while simultaneously adding to the linguistic muddle in my head – the murkiest depths of the latter being reached when I was commissioned to translate a novel from the Galician dialect into English, with the help of a hastily scribbled German translation that the (German-born) author had written for her mother. Learning Spanish was not without its mishaps. I think I will forever be remembered by my Spanish flatmates for casually remarking over lunch one day, ‘No me gusta nada la comida que tiene preservativos’, which translates as ‘ I can’t stand food with condoms in it.’ (I was only trying to say I don’t like preservatives…)

Subsequent attempts to learn Arabic while on a working stint in the Middle East yielded frustratingly little fruit: I got blindsided by the Arabs’ utterly inconsiderate convention of writing from right to left, in squiggles that represent only consonants, leaving the vowels almost entirely up to the reader’s imagination. And as the old Zen saying goes, in the beginner’s mind there are many possibilities… (But seriously, on the subject of different alphabets, there is a fascinating account of the development of writing systems in Maryanne Wolf’s book, ‘Proust and the Squid’. Frustratingly though, her wonderful historical descriptions are somewhat marred by her rather apocryphal views on the emerging culture of what she calls the ‘Google universe’, in which ‘continuous partial attention and multitasking’ are the norm. She fears (but does not substantiate) that this will lead to huge compromises in the human race’s ability to conduct the ‘deep examination of thoughts, words and reality’ which is characteristic of literate societies. Ja well… she hasn’t convinced me. More about that in a later blog, perhaps – in which I promise I will focus on matters related to learning and technology…

My recent stay in India immersed me in the quaint and colourful world of ‘Indlish’ (Indian English) – part charming old English from the Raj era, and part off-the-wall linguistic idiosyncrasy. The owner of the travel agency I used in Bangalore had the distinction of being called the ‘Proprietrix’ on her business card, store rooms were called ‘godowns’ (even if you had to go upstairs to get to them), and shopfronts frequently displayed beautifully calligraphed notices advising customers to ‘Enter from the backside only’ – a surprisingly common linguistic quirk, which was immortalised by author Binoo John, in the title for his book on Indlish. Perhaps the most memorable example from his book is the supposedly popular opening line in official letters: ‘Dear Sir, with reference to your above see my below.’ Ja well…!

And now, here I am in England, where all manner of Innglisshes are spoken by the local tribes – some of them completely incomprehensible to the untrained ear. No fine… it seems my journey into linguistics has only just begun!

By Gabi

As avatars, do we ‘act our age’?

In a recent post, Ming considered whether people create avatars to look like their ‘real selves’ or ‘ideal forms’ of themselves. My own thesis was concerned with age discrimination, and after reading Ming’s post, it struck me that I have never encountered an ‘old’ avatar in Second Life. Statistics suggest that the average age of a Second Life user is early to mid-30’s. If we were to judge by appearances alone, we might be led to believe that the ‘people behind the avatars’ were all in their 20s. It got me wondering: Is it possible to make your avatar look older? Do people tend to create avatars who reflect their real age? And if not, why not?

Recent research (September 2008) asked 78 participants whether their avatar’s age reflected their real age, with results indicating the following:

17% appears much younger than me
24% appears slightly younger than me
46% more or less the same age
8% appears slightly older than me
1% appears much older than me
1% my avatar is not one where age is apparent

Evidence on social stereotyping indicates that people are classified into in-groups and out-groups according to whether they are perceived to ‘belong’ to a group on the basis of certain characteristics. The social psychology literature suggests that when we first meet a person in real life, we tend to categorise them according to salient characteristics (e.g. age, gender, etc) and these categorisations can influence our judgements and the way we behave towards them. Does the same apply to our Second Life behaviour? If an avatar appeared to be more mature in age, would they be treated differently by a group of younger-looking avatars?

This could lead to some very complex social situations: we could, for example, find that a 20 year old decides to create an older looking avatar, and faces ‘second life age discrimination’ from a group of avatars who, in real life, are in their 30’s.

An interview with Harr Ireton, a man whose avatar has been created to reflect his real life appearance (see picture here), acknowledged that he had “run into several situations where someone wanted to put me down or shut me out for having grey hair”. Although Harr also noted that such situations were rare, they are worth consideration.

I believe that Second Life is an excellent educational resource, with plenty of potential to be incorporated into the Occupational Psychology course. However, I do think this issue needs to be considered. Will students entering Second Life get the impression that all other students on the course are younger than them? Although this shouldn’t matter, will it cause more mature students to create avatars to ‘fit in’ with the ‘in-group’, so that their own avatar appears younger than their actual age?

I don’t know the answers to these questions, but it seems to me that this is an area worthy of future research.

Kelly Barklamb, 25th March 2009.

Where are we so far? A summary

After over a month of intense collective blogging and critical friending, I thought it useful to capture some ‘highlights’, in the order in which they were contributed. The topics are varied. The tag cloud only gives a partial view of the richness of this blog.

The purpose here is to offer, on a single page, an overview of some of the key ideas that colleagues have contributed so far, in a way that the tag cloud does not capture. Maybe another contributor can select some of these highlights and weave them into a meaningful post? Or perhaps categorise them (with significant areas of overlap, I’m sure) in a way that -again- the tag cloud cannot do?

Learning 2.0, gradeguru.com, Turnitin… but academics are unconvinced (Gilly)

Graduating from the Learning Futures Academy (M Mobbs)

Change through research – the Animal Kingdom (Ale)

Mushrooming of e-book readers (Pal)

Tactile thinking & tips to use stiftables in SL (M Wheeler)

Changing teaching through trial and error with learning technologies (Jai)

‘The future’ according to the London Tech Summit 2009 (Sandra)

Sustainability of education: will e-learning be essential? (David)

Learning, teaching, the environment and space (Sahm)

Podcasting is normalised… but hot still (Ming)

Remote applications for editing graphics and photos (Sandra)

Cloud computing and access to resources after graduation (M Mobbs)

The value of good teaching – are we too obsessed with learning (and political correctness?) (Ale)

Domesticating iPods – what do our learners use to listen to their course audio files? (Pal)

Free content, open educational resources and hidden agendas (Sandra)

Saving penalties, training goalkeepers: let’s use video footage on our iPods (Jai)

Infectious disease: using iPhones can seriously change your behaviours (M Wheeler)

Teamwork, communication, roles and collaboration post our National Space Centre visit (Sahm)

Being naked in Second Life (Ming)

Centralising BDRA resources (David)

Success factors of Web 2.0 (Roger)

The significance of rocks: past, present and future (Gilly)

Cool, useful web-based resources (Sandra)

BDRA’s knowledge store: the way forward (David)

Using an iPhone and being a puppet master (or being a puppet oneself?) (Jai)

Disruptive technologies, unexpected changes… and even benefits (M Wheeler)

Wiki-ing a podcast: can we really annotate an audio file in a usable format? (Pal)

Teaching memories with old and stable technologies + impact on today’s practices and on the self (Roger)

Detox yourself – give up technology for a bit! (Sahm)

Text’n'talk: what what works and what not in Second Life (Ming)

The Media Zoo today and in the future (M Wheeler)

Street view on Google – Earth-tivities are next! (Gilly)

In sum, a wide variety of contributions, reflecting the interests and thoughts of each member of our team, as well as some collective understanding around key concepts. Let this journey continue!

Alejandro Armellini
22 March 2009

Playing in the Same Key

Apparently, I am the ‘new Matthew Mobbs’; at least, this is how I have been introduced to my colleagues in the Attenborough Tower.

Highly flattered as I am to be compared to this articulate educator, software wizard and internationally renowned Mick Jagger impersonator (he really is very good – ask for ‘You Tube’ proof!), I know it will be some time before I am able to fill Matt’s shoes (if ever) and find myself up to speed on the many BDRA projects. But I have made a start. And it has been very exciting.

But today I will wear my other HE hat as a long-in-the-tooth face-to-face tutor and distance learning e-moderator. What is clear is that the emerging e-learning technologies and associated pedagogies that the Alliance rigorously explores allow our students to confront us with differing expectations. For this reason, the skills base required of the modern educator appears daunting.

I see BDRA at the cutting edge of research into these technologies – podcasts, e-books, 3-D MUVES such as Second Life, and so on. It provides the link between research and practice that is so vital in academia. Via its many research dissemination avenues and through innovative practices such as the Media Zoo’s  excellent Carpe Diem two-day workshop, BDRA enables educators to adapt their material to best meet these new student expectations. BDRA offers the reasons why they should or, equally as important, shouldn’t do so.

But I wonder whether there is a danger that the real-world application of these excellent educational innovations will be left far behind the research.

For example, as a tutor, I can see how a short, regular, Audacity-edited podcast on recent global events could add significantly to the International Relations course I teach. The audio could be combined with some animated Powerpoint slides containing website screenshots and URLs to produce a useful Adobe Presentation. A wiki would allow my students to add their own thoughts, or perhaps I could even have them take a small quiz in Blackboard, reinforcing what they have just heard. As a learning technologist, I can do this.

But do I really think an educator – and I’m not trying to be critical here – who indents text on a module reading list by using the Tab key will have (or ever find the time to acquire) the technical ability to do the same?

This is where university administrations have to take up the challenge laid down by research groups such as BDRA, as the potential of what can be done may differ significantly from what is actually offered to the modern (fee-paying and discerning) student. It’s stating the obvious, but this can be achieved only through significant investment in people and training, and an appreciation of the future of HE.

In considering whether universities – and university departments within a university – can afford to be complacent  in giving academics all the help they need in overcoming the gap between research and practice, I turn to the (completely fabricated) words of the Mobbs-ter’s rock mentor: “Hey Keef, man, it sounds better if we all play in the same key, you know?”

As we know, students, the masters of Web 2.0 social networking and inveterate ‘chatters’, have very keen ears.

Simon

Learning Technologist

Beyond Distance we have a message for you. Over.

Look at Street view in Google.

On the regular and familiar computer screen a view of the Earth will appear seen from space. The screen zooms in and in and in, at Disney World speed , covering countries, oceans and cities until your chosen street appears. And you are part of it- no longer just a birds eye view. Dynamic.

It’s been achieved over the past year by vehicles with roof mounted cameras throughout the cities of Britain. Find your home, or office- you can’t help but be amazed.

Fabulous fun or sinister exploitation- to date the blogosphere can’t decide!

Is there value for learning in there? You bet there is. All information, especially highly accessible, authentic and attractive can be brought into the service of learning. In a situation of pressure on finances in universities we can-must-should deploy these amazing free resources. Earth-tivities for all?

Gilly Salmon

DIUS @ Media Zoo

Trusted readers of my contributions to the Beyond Distance Blog may have noticed that until now my blog posts have not mentioned my work in the Media Zoo. Well I thought it was time to include a piece…

Those of you who are familiar with the Media Zoo and the approach taken will know that it has proven to be an important mechanism for disseminating the cutting edge research undertaken by the department to both internal and external markets. So we were pleased to welcome Martin Williams and John McLaughlin from the Department for Innovation, Universities & Skills (DIUS) to the Media Zoo for a discussion on how to successfully integrate learning technologies into teaching practices and how these may impact upon the student experience in the immediate to long-term future – which coincides nicely with our newer research projects – CALF (Creating Academic Learning Futures).

Following an interesting discussion with some student representatives that highlighted some positive and negative aspects of the institution (which may be reflected upon in later posts), the focus of the discussion changed to technologies, our other research projects, but maybe more importantly, our strategies for institutional change.

External visitors are important if we are to continue to raise the profile of the Media Zoo nationally; the visit from DIUS follows on the back of other important visits from the Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA), the Royal Air Force (RAF) and recently a visit from the Joint Information Systems Council (JISC).

So what is next for the Media Zoo? You’ll have to wait until I write again on Sunday 5th April!

Matthew
Keeper of the Media Zoo

Text vs. voice-based communication in Second Life

In our previous experiments in Second Life (SL), we stick to text-based communication only. Not only because it’s easy and less demanding on the computer, but also because of other advantages it offers, especially in an educational context. Here are some reflections on what have been perceived by tutors and students as pros and cons of text and voice-based communication in SL.

A primary benefit of text-based communication in SL is that students and tutors can have a transcript of what they have discussed during the session, so they revisit later on. It is also useful for those students who were unable to participate in the SL session to have an idea of what happened.

There are other pros using text-based communication:
• Text-based communication offers an opportunity that everybody’s ideas could be equally heard and fairly judged. It encourages people to focus on what was actually being said instead of who said it and how it was said.
• Communication through text might encourage shy people to speak out and help them to bring out their ideas. It might help people to say what they really want to say without worrying being intimidated by others.
• Text-based communication might be preferred by international students whose first language isn’t English.
• Sometimes, it can be easier talking to people you don’t know well through text. It can be easier to start a conversation with a stranger through text too.
• People put their ideas in a more concise way through text. They try to get to the point when they type. Their ideas become clearer and more precise via text, whereas real life spoken conversations are more casual and less thought through.

There are disadvantages of using text-based communication. First of all, talking is a lot easier than typing. It takes more time in putting what one wants to say in text than just saying them. Sometimes, people get fed up or give up easily if the discussion is through text, whereas they would have discussed and negotiated more in a real life conversation.

There are other cons, such as:
• Need certain skills such as typing skills and skills on how to communicate fast and efficiently in a text-based environment.
• Communication could be more formal through text than through voice. People make more jokes in a real life conversation.
• Text-based chat in SL can be unstructured and more difficult to follow up a thread if the answer comes out several statements later. It could also be difficult to make comment to different points through text.
• It could be difficult for people to negotiate and reach an agreement on something through text, if they come around and wouldn’t agree on something easily.
• It is much easier to use text-based tools on a one-to-one basis than in a group setting. On a one-to-one basis, both parties have equal opportunities to speak, whereas in a group setting, participants sometimes have to compete for a chance to speak.
• Voice-based offers advantages over text-based if the nature of the communication is for providing feedback or talking things through, etc.
• Learners with Dyslexia may struggle to follow high paced conversation and may not be confident enough to add a contribution.

However, it can be equally difficult to manage a large group in SL through either text or voice when participants try to speak at the same time.

Ming 19 March 2009

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 507 other followers

%d bloggers like this: