Farewell to the Zookeeper

Our colleague, Matthew Wheeler, is leaving Beyond Distance tomorrow to take up an offer he couldn’t refuse in the commercial sector. His absence will be sorely felt. Matthew’s many and rich contributions in the three years since he joined Beyond Distance have included:

  • Developing the Media Zoo and training countless users in Second Life
  • Leading the SEAL and the GECKO projects, and playing a leading role in the Second Life aspects of MOOSE and DUCKLING
  • Providing technical and creative support to all the Beyond Distance projects
  • Authoring and co-authoring papers on Second Life and green education (See below)
  • Opening Beyond Distance to commercial possibilities
  • Developing bids and proposals for a range of projects
  • Organising the annual Learning Futures Festivals

On a personal level, Matthew has been our Second Life real estate advisor and shoe shopping consultant, our green conscience, our resident humorist, our friendly enabler of all kinds of mysterious technologies, our model early adopter of all things iPhone, our general all-purpose advisor and problem solver, our leader in funky dance moves, and a friend to all of us. Matt, what can we say? We are heartbroken that you’re leaving us, but we wish you everything of the best in your new job.

Thank you, Matt, for teaching us to fly.

By Gabi Witthaus

*****************************************************

The following publications by Matthew are available in the Leicester Research Archives:

Second Life for archaeology, digital photography, and media and communication education – three case studies. (Co-authored with Nie, M. and Edirisingha, P., June 2009)

Tutoring at a distance, online tutoring and tutoring in Second Life. (Co-authored with David Hawkridge, June 2009)

How green is your learning? Pedagogical options for environmentally sustainable education. (Co-authored with Nikoi, S., June 2009)

And this one in  BJET: Developing the Media Zoo in Second Life (May, 2009)

The Post-Google Generation

Last April I attended E for Enhancement 2009, an all-Wales e-Learning conference in Cardiff. During his very inspiring keynote, Prof Stephen Heppell related some facts about the online behaviour of the very young. In one of his projects, Prof Heppell, in perhaps an excessive burst of trustful enthusiasm, handed out iPhones to young teens and set them to work on a series of tasks which took several weeks to complete. At the end of the project, the students reported that they had used every feature of the iPhone “except this one button which has something to do with work” — email. Prof Heppell also stated that for children younger than 10, the search engine of choice is YouTube. Indeed, as of January 2009, the number two search engine, after Google of course, is YouTube.

I don’t recall whether Prof Heppell used the term “the post-Google Generation” in his keynote, but it is most appropriate for the age group (probably those born after 1990) which does not even recognise the need to use the all-pervasive Google to find things on the web. Marc Prensky gave us the term “digital natives.” The “Google generation” has been used to refer generally to those who seem to know no other way of finding information than to “Google it.” But I find it fascinating that very young people, who have never known a world not just without the internet but without full multi-media, go directly to the multi-media offerings of YouTube. Indeed, until I heard Prof Heppell quote this statistic, I did not even consider YouTube to be a search engine.

But of course it is a search engine. Need a recipe for macaroni cheese? YouTube not only displays the recipe but shows just how the butter should look when it’s time to stir in the flour to make the sauce. Just getting started in Second Life? There are innumerable “Beginning Second Life” tutorials on YouTube, some posted by higher education instructors for their own university students.

The truly fascinating question for me is: why is it that very young people who grow up with digital multi-media seem to think differently about how to search, how to learn, and how to do just about everything? Why do they skip Google when older surfers can’t live without it?

My post-Google-Generation daughter decided to learn to play the piano – well, the digital keyboard. We were ready with a piano teacher and the traditional regime of “one lesson per week, then nag daughter to practice.” Daughter had other plans. “I’ll just teach myself from YouTube,” she announced. As a child, I learnt piano the traditional way, and after one or two years of lessons, I could still only play fairly boring pieces. Yet after only a couple of months of YouTube, Daughter can play a handful of fairly impressive pieces. Perhaps her relative success can be attributed to the fact she chose exactly what she wanted to learn to play, then just learnt it, and enjoyed it, and therefore got results more quickly. The downside is that Daughter has not learnt to read much music from YouTube. But in a very post-Google way, she achieved what she wanted: musical enjoyment for herself and her listeners through playing the piano.

In “Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants,” Marc Prensky suggests that prolonged exposure to immersive digital multi-media actually results in fundamentally different thinking processes. The onus is on the educator, therefore, to be prepared with learning tools suited for the post-Google Generation, as well as with the research to inform and support the use of such tools.

Terese Bird

Measuring the Impact of the Oil Rig SL-tivity for Occupational Psychology MSc Students

Following Simon’s recent blog  about the oil rig task that is currently being produced for the Occupational Psychology team, I have been thinking about how we will measure the potential benefits for the students, and how we might expect this SL-tivity to impact the learning experiences of the students on our MSc courses.

Because of the specific nature of the oil rig task, not all students on the course will be required to use Second Life to complete the unit assignment for this module, which means that it will be possible to conduct a between-subjects comparison: How does the learning experience of students using Second Life differ to the learning experiences of those who are not using Second Life?

One way of exploring this will be through interviewing the students, asking them to evaluate their experiences. A more indirect measure might involve looking at students’ performance against particular learning outcomes (for example, perhaps looking at whether Second Life usage is related to better marks in this unit assignment).

While I was thinking about this, I came across an interesting case study  from the Loyalist College in Canada. The task has been created for Customs and Immigrations students who are training to become guards on the US-Canadian border. Because of changes to security regulations after September 11, students were no longer able to train with actual border guards. Therefore, a virtual border crossing simulation was created in Second Life.

Since the simulation was created, students’ scores on critical skills tests were reported to have increased from 56% success in 2007 to 95% by the end of 2008. In addition to this, increased numbers of students and faculty staff were reported to have explored Second Life for “mixed purposes” since the simulation was implemented.

Ken Hudson, Managing Director of the Virtual World Design Centre at the Loyalist College, described the impact of this SL intervention as “amazing and unprecedented.” In the report written about this intervention, the following quote from Ken Hodges was included:

“No single technological addition has ever impacted grades at the college in such a positive way. The affordable tools of Second Life allowed us to explore potential applications for education. Loyalist College believes strongly that were it not for Second Life, we would not be involved in virtual worlds whatsoever. The learning in these spaces is amazing, and when we are working with 30% increases in success, there is nothing more memorable than that.”

Although the task involved and the context of this case study is very different to our ‘oil rig’ task within Occupational Psychology, the basic underlying principles behind what we are trying to achieve are clearly comparable. I hope that, in time, once we have the SL-tivity up and running, we will also begin to see similar benefits for our students. Watch this space…

Kelly Barklamb

Creating to share; promises and pitfalls

Last week I participated in a seminar organized by JISC in Ormskirk. The focus of the seminar was creating and sharing digital content with emphasis on the promises and pitfalls of Open Educational Resources (OER). Representatives from the CETL on Reusable Learning Objects, SOLSTICE, ROCOCO, Q-ROLO, Open Spires and ReFORM spoke about their projects and took part in discussions about the future of OERs. I came away from the meeting with a feeling that whilst Open Educational Resources offer a lot of promise there is the need for a concerted effort to debate and find solutions to some of the drawbacks that threaten the potential benefits of these resources to the HE sector. Here are a few things mentioned regarding benefits and pitfalls:

Benefits
• Economies of scale in terms of cost benefit analysis
• Improved access and better use of existing resources
• Innovation in the design of teaching and learning materials

Pitfalls
• Copyright issues
• Institutional barriers in terms of existing curriculum processes
• Lack of local content repositories
• OER literacy i.e. the capacity of academic staff to create and share open learning resources

I was quite struck by the discussion on how to engage various stakeholders to maximize the benefits of OERs whilst addressing the pitfalls. What was missing in all the discussions was the role of learners in advancing the vision of the OER movement. The Edgeless University report has emphasized the need to engage students in the design of courses to better understand their needs and also determine when and how teaching and learning should happen in the future. Clearly, making OERs more sustainable will require not just institutional commitment to “openness” in teaching and learning, or overcoming copyright hurdles or changing staff attitudes towards “open learning design” but more importantly how we as OER practitioners draw lessons from student experiences in HE to improve the quality of our materials in order to motivate learners locally and international to use these materials.

Samuel Nikoi ( 24 July 2009)

The impact of Podcasting on the learning experience of distance learners

The psychology course team has produced podcasts as part of the DUCKLING intervention for their two distance learning programmes: MSc in Occupational Psychology and Psychology of Work. The course team developed podcasts in four categories: dissertation podcasts, assignment podcasts, research methods podcasts and feedback podcasts, and made them available through Blackboard since April 2009.

I recently collected evidence regarding student use of these podcasts. I interviewed several students, and I collected student feedback and comments from the Blackboard survey and discussion board. Here is an overview of what student say about using the podcasts.

 1. Overall, what did students think of the podcasts?

Overall, students appreciated the podcasts provided by the course team. They used words such as ‘excellent’, ‘helpful’, ‘useful’, ‘motivating’, ‘beneficial’, ‘reassuring’ and ‘I like it a lot’ to described their positive experience of using podcasts.

2.      How did students use the podcasts?

Some students downloaded the podcasts and listened to them from their mobile devices such as an MP3 player or iPhone, indicating that they recognized the possibility of podcasting in supporting their learning on the move. Some used the podcasts directly from the Blackboard, indicating that they might need further guidance on how to use the podcasts in a different way.

Some listened to the same podcast again and again until they fully understood. Sometimes they repeated listening to the same podcast for reassuring.

3.      What did students consider beneficial to their learning by using the podcasts?

Students identified a number of ways in which the podcasts particularly enhanced their learning experience:

  • Building tutor-student relationship

Students say that ‘listening to the tutor’s voice’ and ‘hearing the tones’ in a podcast resembles ‘direct communication’ or ‘getting their time’ and ‘having a conversation’. It makes their learning more lively and ‘personal’. Students feel more ‘interactive’, ‘connected’ and ‘closer to the tutor’ when listening to the podcasts.

  • Providing quality instruction and guidance

Students reported that podcasts are an effective way of delivering quality instruction and guidance. ‘Hearing the voice, tone, emphasis and pause’ helps ‘clarify’ things. It helps deliver ‘clearer instruction and guidance’ and provide more detailed information on specific points. It helps students ‘focus’ and ‘concentrate’ on certain points and ‘understand more of the content’. Students feel that the podcasts help with ‘consolidating’, ‘reconfirming’, ‘reassuring’, and they feel more ‘comfortable’ and ‘confident’ that they’re ‘on the right track’.

  • Increasing flexibility and mobility in learning

Students recognised the benefit of using podcasts in a car or on a bus, at work or at home whilst doing something else, indicating that they appreciate the potential of podcasting in increasing flexibility and mobility of their learning.

4.      In what ways did students think that the podcasts could be improved in future?

As the experience of using podcasts has been so positive, students expected that the podcasts could be incorporated extensively into the course through making available:

  • Podcasts for all modules
  • Podcasts for each unit of the module as a warm-up or summary
  • Podcasts explaining key units or concepts
  • Podcasts for each stage of the dissertation
  • Podcasts for e-library
  • Podcasts for recorded materials

 Ming      23 July 2009

Developing the Second Life oil rig

rig1Further to my blog post of 22 June, Matt and I have been developing the wonderful oil rig donated to the Duckling project by Sky Maruti.

The first priority was to find a suitable spot on the Media Zoo island for the rig. We wanted it in the lagoon, but didn’t need it to overpower the other structure there, the boat house. Using the island owner’s avatar, I set about flattening the land on the peninsula, both above water and below.

rig2This opened up a sizable area of the lagoon, into which we placed the oil rig. Because it is a single (linked) artefact, I was able to place the structure precisely so that the bottom access platform just touched the water (this is where the evacuation rescue boat will dock), while the rear of the rig abutted the edge of the island.

Inside the housing areas of the rig, we are in the process of adding floors, extra stairwells, equipment, and so forth. At present, we are only doing the obvious builds. The occupational psychologists on Duckling will need to become familiar with the layout of the rig, and then sit down with us to work through the redesign.

In the meantime, though, I am searching X Street SL for artefacts to place on the rig. Some of these will need to be utilised for the altered environmental conditions that will necessitate the evacuation, so realism is important (an electrical fire needs to be caused by an electrical device such as a PC).

Once we have completed the new layout and placed the artefacts in suitable positions – and sourced a rescue boat! – the occupational psychologists can begin to finalise their SL-tivities.

Small Scale Experimental Machine

Almost three years to the day I took up a short-term contract with the Beyond Distance Research Alliance at the University of Leicester. I left a full-time, well paid job, moved my family from Sheffield to Leicester to take up the challenge of implementing what was then just the concept of the Media Zoo. What sold this position to me was not only the opportunity of working in a high class research-led institution; but more importantly for me was the idea of exploring the Exotics House and the future adoption of educational technologies for teaching and learning.

In my tenure as the Keeper of the Media Zoo I have been fortunate to be part of the explosion of podcasts in education, the use of hand-held mobile devices and more recently the immersion opportunities provided by Second Life. I have worked with some amazing people and organisations during this time which would take me too long to mention! I said recently at a conference in Poland that in the last three years I have learnt more than at any other point of my life – and I meant it! But where did this idea of technology futurism begin – well that is a debate for another day but maybe it started with the Baby?

60 years to the day the Small Scale Experimental Machine, or “Baby”, was the first computer to contain memory which could store a program. The room-sized computer’s ability to carry out different tasks, without having to be rebuilt, has led some to describe it as the “first modern PC”. Using just 128 bytes of memory, it successfully ran its first set of instructions to determine the highest factor of a number on 21 June 1948.

“We were extremely excited,” Geoff Tootill, one of the builders of Baby told BBC News. “We congratulated each other and then went and had lunch in the canteen.” I like their style!

It may be time for me to move onto pastures new, but I’m certain the Beyond Distance Research Alliance, the Media Zoo and the University of Leicester will continue to undertake cutting-edge, innovate research for the good of education. I’m just pleased to have played a small part in the process of innovating education through research.

Thank you to everyone I have had the pleasure of working with and I look forward to seeing you all on the circuit soon when I start my new job with Pebble Learning.

Matthew

New Skills for Learning Professionals

"In a Learning 2.0 world, where learning and performance solutions take on a wider variety of forms and where churn happens at a much more rapid pace, what new skills and knowledge are required for learning professionals?"

"In a Learning 2.0 world, where learning and performance solutions take on a wider variety of forms and where churn happens at a much more rapid pace, what new skills and knowledge are required for learning professionals?"

This month’s Big Question posed on the Learning Circuits blog asks us to consider what new skills are needed for learning professionals. A bit of context here: Learning Circuits is Tony Karrer’s blog for the ASTD (American Society for Training and Development), and is aimed at ‘workplace learning and performance professionals’. There is a very rich discussion taking place around this question, mostly from a corporate training perspective, although the issues are not too different in higher education.

What follows is my own motley list, along with comments from others who have responded so far. By the way, no-one has yet defined ‘learning professional’ in the discussion. I’m reading it as ‘someone who helps other people learn for a living’. (Keeping it nice and broad… :-) )

OK, so here’s the list:

1. Reflect on how learning happens.

With Web 2.0, we have the technologies at our disposal to provide highly collaborative or hugely personalised learning experiences, or mass-scale, standardised, content-driven education. I expect we will see more of all of these in time to come. In all cases, learning professionals will need to approach their job reflectively. Mohammed Amine Chatti‘s description of double loop learning is a nice model, and Nancy White emphasises the value of shared reflection through blogging and conversations with peers.

2. Keep learning – and networking.

Harold Jarche writes about the importance of making your learning process publicly visible, for example through blogging, participating in online networks, and building up a trusted – and trusting – base of followers on Twitter. He says: ‘It’s not just an advantage to belong to diverse professional networks, but… it is now a significant disadvantage to not actively participate in social learning networks.’ This explicit linking of social networking with professional development is a thread running through almost all of the responses to the Big Question.

3. And nurturing…

Clark Quinn points to the need for learning facilitators to understand ‘how to nurture groups into cohesion, communication and collaboration.’ I love the word ‘nurture’ there – it’s so exquisitely non-technical!

Nancy White deals briefly with the question of community leadership and facilitation in her third post, and distinguishes between the concept of ‘community’ and ‘network’. (At the risk of oversimplifying: a community is a more ‘bounded’ group; a network has fuzzier edges.) The skills for facilitating both are different, and those of us in the business of helping people learn need to know when to use which kinds of skills.

4. Share your knowledge

Karyn Romeis challenges learning professionals to help shape their organisation’s learning strategy by contributing their knowledge from a grassroots perspective. She gives a great anecdote from her own experience, which is followed by some interesting comments from readers on the ethics of sharing/ withholding knowledge from one’s employer.

5. Manage that information flow!

Nancy White’s second post contains a fabulous set of guidelines for managing the ‘river’ of information that is hurtling  past us at such speed. She talks about the need for scanning skills, filtering skills, synthesising and sense-making skills, as well as the ability to ask good questions. She also mentions the role of the technology steward, which is next on my list…

6. Engaging with emerging technologies is no longer optional.

Clive Shepherd notes that many learning and development professionals ‘have fallen behind in their continuing professional development’. He says: ‘I can’t see a future for those [learning and development] professionals currently in denial and just hoping all this [proliferation of new learning media] will just blow over. I can’t imagine who will want to employ them.’

Jay Cross believes that learning professionals need to be proactive with regard to emerging technologies, and points to the importance of the ‘community technology steward’ – described in the forthcoming book by Etienne Wenger, Nancy White and John Smith, Digital Habitats: Stewarding Technology for Communities. Technology stewards are ‘people with enough experience of the workings of a community to understand its technology needs and enough experience with technology to take leadership in addressing those needs’. I agree with Cross’ prediction of ‘job enrichment and greater responsibilities for learning professionals who take on the challenge.’

7. Open Educational Resources (OERs) are here to stay: don’t reinvent when you can repurpose.

Something that has not received much attention in the discussion so far is the role of OERs in teaching and learning today. Thank you to self-confessed vegan geek, Victoria MacArthur, for telling us about the Irish National Digital Learning Repository. (See also Leicester’s OTTER project, which is part of the broader JISC-funded UK OER initiative.) The proliferation of OERs provides opportunities for learning design by ‘mashup’ rather than starting from scratch, requiring at least a different approach, if not new skills.

8. Be a mensch!

Finally, what better way to end than with Nancy White’s four meta skills for learning professionals. This was in the first of her four posts, and it’s a wonderful list, which puts the whole discussion into perspective: learning professionals need to have self-awareness, generosity, humility and willingness to risk. All the qualities valued in the old Yiddish concept of a mensch. A learning professional (however defined) is first and foremost a human being.

Gabi Witthaus

Talking tombstones in 2020

A friend of mine used to walk on the Greek islands. Cemeteries there have many photos on the tombstones of the dear departed. He decided he would like to have a tape-recording instead on his, but so far as I know he has never made up his mind about what he would say.*

During a 1995 Computer-Assisted Learning conference after-dinner speech, in New College Cambridge, I pointed to the portraits round the dining hall. In future, I suggested, these would be holograms of distinguished professors, and from beyond the grave they would answer your questions (using artificial intelligence of course). Among the diners, I picked out Tim O’Shea, now Vice-Chancellor of Edinburgh University, as likely to become worthy of a hologram – and a seat in the House of Lords. He liked that idea.

Cast your mind forward to 2020. Among e-learning researchers of the early 21st century, a few may deserve hologram recognition. In the Fourth Dimension Virtual Hall of Fame you will find those who contributed to theory and practice in our field. Here are three questions I would like to ask them:

1.     Which outstanding pieces of research do you recall and who were they by?

2.     What were the major barriers to adoption of e-learning?

3.     Did you make any major mistakes and what did you learn from them?

Perhaps you already have an inkling of the answers. If so, why not publish them in this blog?

David

 

*Gumpert, Gary (1987) Talking Tombstones and Other Tales of the Media Age. New York: Oxford University Press.

A meeting about podcasts

Encontro sobre podcasts  http://www.iep.uminho.pt/encontro.podcast/
8 – 9 July 2009, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.

I was fortunate to attend a two-day conference on podcasting organised by my colleague Dr Ana Amelia Amorim Carvalho. There were more than 100 delegates from different parts of Portugal representing all areas of education – primary, secondary, higher, and non-formal educational institutions, all having different levels of expertise in podcasting and other web 2.0 technologies for learning.

The first day was devoted to presentations by delegates – teachers from schools and lecturers from universities – reporting their own experiences of developing podcasts, and their students’ experiences of creating (yes – students creating podcasts) and learning from podcasts. Thanks to Joanna, who translated the proceedings, I was able to understand most of the presentations and discussions at the conference.

The teachers’ and students’ approaches to podcasting deserve a longer, in-depth report, but here I’ll summarise some of the stories that I won’t forget.

  • Primary school children creating podcasts of the books that they studied with their parents. The teacher gives each child (6 year olds) a book to take home, and then parents read stories (from the book) to their child. The teacher gets groups of 3 children to create podcasts based on the stories that they learned at home. The children create podcasts themselves – that means, outlining what they are going to record, doing the actual recording, selecting which bits of recording to go into podcasts, and finally editing (with some help from the teacher).
  • High school students creating video podcasts related to literature classes. Students study literature texts and record what they learned and discussions as podcasts. These podcasts are made available on a public website where anyone can listen and view them and make comments.
  • High school children learning maths using podcasts. Their teacher was looking for a way of providing additional maths support for her students. She was delighted when she found out about podcasts. She has created a large number of podcasts describing various mathematical formulas and solving mathematical problems. Students report that they can now learn and revise at home as if the teacher were with them.

I sat through 11 presentations: each deserves a longer treatment. If you can read Portuguese, visit the conference website at: http://www.iep.uminho.pt/encontro.podcast/ to know more about the approaches to using podcasts.

Finally, thanks to Ana for inviting me to the conference and asking me to share our own experience of developing and researching podcasts at Leicester and at Impala (www.impala.ac.uk) partner institutions.

Palitha Edirisingha
BDRA.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 503 other followers

%d bloggers like this: