Kabul academics and students excited about OERs

I have just returned from a four-day workshop in Kabul, partly conducted jointly with Dr Dave Humphreys of the Open University. The workshop was hosted by the British Council and the University of Kabul’s Geology Department, and funded by DfID as part of two projects – DELPHE (Developing Partnerships in Higher Education) and INSPIRE. It was planned in response to requests from Afghan academics for support in curriculum development. Dave’s part of the workshop focused on curriculum design principles and procedures used at the OU, and mine focused on an introduction to open educational resources (OERs).  For the two OER-focused days, there were approximately 30 participants altogether, including six students from the Environmental Protection and Disaster Management faculty, several Geology professors, three researchers from an NGO called AREU (Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit), and academics from a range of Higher Education institutions in and around Kabul representing a variety of disciplines, from Agriculture to Fine Arts to Medicine to ICT.

OER workshop, Kabul

OER workshop, Kabul

In the workshop we discussed the concept of OERs, and participants explored some of the major multi-source repositories such as JorumOpen and OER Commons, as well as the OU’s OpenLearn and the University of Leicester’s OER site. The academics and students spent part of the workshop searching these sites for OERs that might fill gaps in their various curricula. We then discussed how they might use OERs in their teaching (or learning, in the case of the students). The focus was primarily on the reuse of OERs, and included a discussion around the various permissions granted by Creative Commons licences.

Dr Dave Humphreys with Prof. Naim Eqrar

Dr Dave Humphreys with Prof. Naim Eqrar

Predictably perhaps, there were some technical obstacles that threatened to derail the whole event – the biggest culprit being an awfully slow internet connection that repeatedly cut out and became slower and slower as the morning wore on every day, grinding to a complete halt by lunchtime – apparently due to the fact that colleagues in Europe were just firing up all their computers at that time of day… The other significant problem was the limited software on the computers being used, rendering some file types (e.g. docx) unopenable.

Searching for OERs

Searching for OERs

Despite these challenges, the response from Afghan colleagues was overwhelmingly positive. A few comments from the participants will give a feel for their enthusiasm.

Academics:

“I was amazed to see this invaluable treasure that we can access so easily.”

“I liked that now we can solve some of our problems with these kinds of sites (OER repositories)… that you gave us… Also I want to say that this is one of the most important parts of education that everyone should know about.”

Students:

“When our teacher is planning to teach us about a particular topic in a lecture, I will search before the session for OERs on that subject so that I am well prepared.”

“This is better than a Google search (for learning materials). It’s more relevant.”

“I’m going to use OERs in my free time.”

There was also a great deal of interest – particularly from the students – in producing OERs locally and in collaborating on the translation and repurposing of OERs from elsewhere in the world.

Afghanistan may be war-ravaged and beset by all the infrastructural problems typical of developing countries, but this group of academics and students is focused on building an empowering education system for its people, and they believe that OERs have a role to play. I have come away from Kabul feeling extremely humbled and inspired by this experience, and full of renewed optimism about the potentially useful role of OERs in the global education community.

Kabul street scene (thanks to Dave Humphreys for the photo)

Kabul street scene (thanks to Dave Humphreys for the photo)

Posted by Gabi Witthaus, 28 Feb 2011

Progressive, with a caveat

The Digital Researcher 2011 conference was hosted on St. Valentine’s Day this year.

I looked through the programme and wanted to hear the presentations online because I was unable to attend the event in person. The conference had a dedicated Twitter hashtag (#dr11) and so I was able to follow all the asynchronous conversation.

I was also able to help one delegate, @hypatia58, who had never used a hashtag on her laptop previously. Allowing people online to help others attending in person, in real-time is a powerful personal experience, and can be provided using social media.

The conference was “slow to get started” and this was tweeted frequently during the early hours. There were complaints about the Wifi access, which seems disappointing given the conference was about the digital researcher in 2011.

The delegates appeared to comprise the ‘curious’, the ‘spurious’ and early adopters. These also included individuals sent by their institutions to go away and learn about the technology, and it seems a shame the Wifi access could not sustain the demand through the day.

The audio stream was intermittent throughout, and affected the scheduling of the rest of my day. I was still keen on listening to the keynotes, nevertheless, and from what I heard, they were extremely insightful.

At this point, I began to consider the importance of thorough systems testing for ambitious ventures such as live-streaming. Technological innovations are well worth the effort, provided time is given to making sure things are given the best chance of working on the day.

The first time someone tries something new, ideally should not be on the day of event. A conference such as this is important for the digital researcher movement, and good technological performance can do so much to help convince the technologically-reluctant.

The message from #dr11 was about collaboration, and few would argue the movement cannot be sustained without the formation of networks. More research needs to concentrate on the impact of these technologies on individuals, their peers and the wider institution.

The outcome measures need to be defined because many individuals will spend a lot of time using technologies, however, may not be producing more quality research as a consequence. I look forward to further development in this area.

Rakesh Patel

When is a computer not a computer?

Yesterday, I had an interesting discussion with my colleague Terese. She mentioned this website that lists Apple as the top manufacturer of “mobile PCs”. My question was, “Is the iPad a computer?”

I think the answer falls into the “glass half full or empty” category. The iPad is clearly computer technology. What Apple have done is to take a laptop and remove or “re-spec” many of the components. So, remove keyboard, mouse, hard-drive, USB, DVD, 3D graphics, cooling fans and the ability to run “ordinary” programs. Add touch-screen, Flash memory, a proper user interface and “apps”.  The result is a machine that’s really good at the things it’s designed for, but limited in what it can do.

Of course, there are people who don’t like being restricted, and immediately try to do more than is intended. When I worked at the Computer Science Department of University of Glasgow, a favourite trick was to “mod” an Xbox – another specialised computer, this time for games. The method was to buy a new BIOS chip and attach it to the existing one, replace the silly hard drive with a much bigger one, add a USB keyboard and mouse, and install Linux. The result? A decent computer with a fantastic graphics card at half the (then) price.

With the iPad, it’s “Jailbreaking”, and it lets you run non-Apple-approved apps. (Of course, Apple are not impressed…)

There are also ways around the reduced-spec of the iPad computer. For example, the Dragon Dictate app provides (remarkably good) speech recognition on the iPad. How, one may ask, when the processor is nowhere near fast enough? Well, you record up to 60 seconds of speech, and when you press “Stop” the iPad sends the recording to Dragon’s server farm somewhere in the world, which converts the audio to text on some multi-GHz computer and then sends the text back to your iPad (a clever promotion strategy for Dragon’s PC software).

My interest, of course, is in running virtual worlds. With a project here using Second Life to create virtual genetics laboratories, I’m interested in just what one needs to use a virtual world.

The ideal is a good computer (PC, or Mac) with a “proper” gaming graphics card. But the ideal is by no means necessary. On my home PC I upgraded the graphics very cheaply and effectively using a card designed more for Blu-ray playback. For system memory, no more than 3Gb is needed, and only the cheapest processors won’t be able to keep up.

So, just how much of a computer does one really need to run Second Life? Linden Labs have been experimenting recently with “the Dragon solution” – as with Dictate on the iPad, using an external server to do the difficult bit (in this case, rendering the graphics). By all accounts, it shows promise. You have to live in the US though if you want to try it :(

If I were to tell you that there is a specialised device just perfect for running Second Life, much cheaper than a PC, fantastic graphics capability, and lots of people already own it, you might wonder why Linden Labs haven’t rushed to release a viewer for it. Well, so do I. Maybe there’s a good technical reason, or maybe it’s political. But to my mind, the XBox 360 is just perfect for Second Life (other games machines are available!). You could even sell the viewer, retail! Maybe Rod Humble would like to comment?

So when is a computer not a computer? Well, I guess the answer is, “When it’s only the bits of a computer you actually need”.

Paul Rudman
Beyond Distance research Alliance

A (very) junior Zookeeper in the making

Conrad at workFor the last two weeks, my 14 year old nephew Conrad has been on work experience in the Zoo. Many people here at the University made this possible, not least of all Jai, for which I and my sister are grateful.

During this time, while we’ve been impressed with his diligence, his ICT skills have been shown to be extraordinarily good. He assures me that his friends have a similar range of skills, picked up not through workshops but simply engaging with technology in everyday life (and on the XBox 360).

I don’t think this is any place to take up the fairly tired digital natives debate (mainly because I think that is a different story), but it is surprising that Conrad and his peers are able to condense into a few years what I think it took me many to learn. I’m very reassured by this fact.

My colleagues and I are certain that this work experience has been beneficial to my nephew, and shown him some of the opportunities that are available to him when he gets older.

And we’ve enjoyed having him here, not least because he was – for much of his time – a fully functioning learning technologist, of which my colleagues made the most.

You can read about Conrad’s time at BDRA on his blog (which I hope he will keep going).

http://conradeastman.wordpress.com

Simon Kear

Keeper of the Media Zoo

A newcomer, from across the pond

It is a pleasure to join the BDRA as a PhD research student, having started less than one month ago. Living in Edmonton, Canada, I am registered part-time and for distance studies. There are two questions I am already receiving, and I’m sure they will continue: Why distance, and why BDRA?

My formal distance studies began with my undergrad at a time when it was called ‘correspondence.’ Fortunately, we had excellent telephone tutors that aided the learning process. I later completed a Master of Distance Education (MDE), studying about distance learning while at a distance, with online conferencing in addition to the readings, papers, and projects. As I contemplated doctoral studies at several times in the past years, it became obvious that I should build from the MDE, and a distance programme was the natural choice. It was time to look beyond my alma mater for a varied experience.

I became familiar with the University of Leicester a number of years ago, in relation to the subject area in which I was teaching. The university’s reputation for research was strong and respected, and I talked to a couple of Canadians whom had completed degrees by distance or in residence. When serious about postgrad training, I was pleased to find the PhD in E-learning and Learning Technologies available through the BDRA. My discussion with Dr Armellini commenced in the latter part of 2009. While other avenues were considered, my comfort with the BDRA remained. I visited in October 2010, following which I confirmed my interest with an application. Drs Armellini and Edirisingha agreed to be my supervisors.

My field of study is e-learning and learning technologies in informal and self-directed work-based learning. I will share more as I settle in and progress in my development as a researcher. Asked what one of my challenges will be, I have to say it will be developing the theoretical framework and methodologies for the study. This will come through extensive reading and critical analysis.

Perhaps worthy of note, I am British, but I had not returned prior to October since my early childhood when my family emigrated from England to Canada. It feels good to be connected though a UK programme, and I look forward to visits in addition to the ongoing contact with my supervisors, student colleagues, researchers, and others in the BDRA.

A.E. (Tony) Ratcliffe

Technolove, kind of

The Internet has changed the way we study, work, socialize, and, even, love. Today being Saint Valentine’s Day, also known as the Day of Love, I feel compelled to write something romantic, kind of, so beware.

Eleven years ago spamming was not as common as it is nowadays. One would still check emails from unknown senders. At that time, I was 16 and still living in Mexico. I was just starting high school.

I had a friend who went on an exchange program to Canada. On his birthday I sent him a personalized ecard. A couple of days later I received an unexpected reply: Hi. I got your ecard, but I think you mistyped the recipient’s address or something. Maybe you want to check it and send it again to the correct person. – X

Huh? – I thought. But my curiosity was aroused. I asked X where was he from. He said he was Canadian and asked me where was I from. And so we began talking. We shared our ideas and our interests. Every day after school I would get home, read his daily email and reply. I enjoyed our conversations. I felt comfortable trusting this person, whom I’d never seen. We became good friends.

Laptop screen with heart

One day he told me: I’m in love with you. I think that there’s a powerful reason why we met in this random way. I’m going to Mexico to meet you.

Uh-oh. In my mind and in my heart, he was only my friend, nothing else. So this story actually had a sad ending. Soon after I rejected his plan, he stopped emailing me. We shared so much, and yet we never met.

But today, eleven years later, I still remember him… and wish him a happy Valentine’s Day.

– Brenda Padilla

Last night´s tour of our virtual genetics lab

Virtual lab tour with HUD shown in-world

Yesterday, we hosted a “Train for Success” event in our virtual genetics lab. The US-based Gronstedt group arrange these regular events at different Second Life venues.
The tour was well attended by educators and business, and seemed to generate rather a lot of positive comments from our visitors, such as:

“I think this is very cool. There is immersion and reenforcement of learned material.”

and on our use of inworld animations showing molecular changes:

“oh, nice display!”
“Oh that is awesome!”
“very, very cool”
“”Nice!”
“I am excited and I have no idea what I am seeing!”
“LOL”

If you missed the tour yesterday, the lab is open in Second Life and you can go and try it out any time, or if you would like your own guided tour of our labs, just email us (details on the project web page).

Paul Rudman
BDRA

Our thanks to Daden Ltd for arranging the event, and to our visitors for their kind comments and interesting questions.

A statistical approach to e-learning

What happens across the pond can give us food for thought. The American Society for Training & Development(ASTD) surveys annually the state of the learning and development industry in that country.

According to a summary of ASTD’s 2010 report , the industry continued to grow in 2009 compared with 2008. The sum spent on training by companies per employee was still rising, even in the recession. More than a third of all learning was delivered or facilitated electronically. Nearly a third was delivered online. Each hour of learning content was re-used about 60 times, compared with about 45 times in 2007. It sounds positive, from an e-learning point of view.

In the UK, Towards Maturity, a group that promotes learning technologies at work, conducts similar surveys. In its 2010 report  is an analysis of what 400 organisations (including a third from the public sector) were doing to ‘deliver business results’ with learning technology. In the top quartile, three-quarters of their staff used e-learning. Compared with traditional methods, e-learning saved 21% in costs, 27% in study time and moved from idea/need to delivery 32% faster. Positive again.

Brian Chapman, who runs his own e-learning company in Utah, surveyed 249 organisations (including a few universities), asking how long it took them to develop e-learning . A simple 1-hour unit (content and questions) took on average 79 hours to design, develop and test, at a cost of about £10K. It cost more to include greater interactivity and multi-media.

Surveys like these seem to provide great hope for learning technologists looking for jobs in difficult times! But all three were published by parties with a vested interest in promoting e-learning. Is there a bias in their statistics?

The Beyond Distance Research Alliance (BDRA) is modest in its approach to using statistics. With its collaborators in projects like TIGER and OSTRICH that focus on quality in online open educational resources, Beyond Distance aims to develop mutually beneficial procedures and OERs, rather than headline-grabbing statistics. At last week’s TIGER Steering Group meeting at the University of Northampton, I was impressed by the dedication and professionalism of staff at De Montfort, Leicester and Northampton, and by their attention to detail.

David Hawkridge

Is it expensive?

A man walks into a bar and asks the barman “Is your Whisky expensive?”

How does he answer?

Alas, there’s no punchline, but the question is not so easy. What factors affect expense?

One factor is of course how much you can afford. But that is variable. Just about everyone in the UK could find three pounds, it’s just that many people have already allocated that money elsewhere – food, for instance.

Another factor is what alternatives are available and how they compare; water is free if one is only thirsty!

Then there’s how important the product is to you, what it will achieve. If you don’t drink, three UK pounds is a lot to pay; if it’s your favourite tipple after a particularly hard day at work it’s perhaps a bargain.

I started thinking about this after a discussion the other week about Second Life. The question arose over whether it was expensive to create a space in the virtual world.

Our experience with the SWIFT project is that a virtual genetics lab is certainly more affordable than a real one! Of course, if you have a couple of million pounds floating around then by all means build another real lab.

But is a real lab as good as a virtual one? That may seem the wrong way around, but what we are doing with the virtual lab is monitoring the student’s every action and offering critical learning resources at the moment they become relevant. To do this in a real lab, you not only need the lab, you need one tutor per student.

Finally, how important is expanding student’s learning opportunities. If, like us, your answer is “very”, and you teach in areas that virtual worlds excel in, virtual worlds need to be given some consideration.

Paul Rudman
Beyond Distance research Alliance

An OER workshop in Afghanistan

We are very excited that Beyond Distance has been given the opportunity to collaborate with the Geology Department at the University of Leicester, and with Dr Dave Humphreys from the Open University, in running a workshop for academics at the University of Kabul in Afghanistan at the end of February. Dave and I have been working together on the programme  on curriculum design, including a focus on the incorporation of open educational resources (OERs) into the curriculum, which we will facilitate jointly.

The workshop is part of an ongoing series of networking activities between universities in the UK, Afghanistan and Pakistan, as part of a project called DELPHE (Development Partnerships in Higher Education), led by Prof. Mike Petterson from Leicester, and supported by the British Council and DfID. (See Mike’s blog posts on an earlier visit to Kabul here.)

According to the DELPHE project plan:

This project has great potential to focus upon some key British Council and DfiD development goals – especially in education, good governance (at an institutional level) poverty alleviation (through development of highly skilled people, and assistance with economic development, e.g. through increased knowledge in mineral resources).

We are thrilled to have this opportunity to contribute to a very meaningful project, and I’m very much looking forward to finding out from colleagues in Kabul about the usefulness (or otherwise) of OERs in their context.

Watch this space for an update from Kabul in a few weeks’ time…

Gabi Witthaus, 4 Feb 2011

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 505 other followers

%d bloggers like this: