The Scoop on Scoop.it

About a month ago I was invited by my colleague Gabi to join Scoop.it.  Her Scoop.it topic is Open Learning News. I could see that her own blog posts and tweets were getting more traffic and retweeting after she began to use Scoop.it. So I decided to give it a try.

I had set up Google Reader to pull in my chosen RSS feeds quite awhile ago, but somehow I didn’t faithfully go and check it. I seemed to be stuck on the fast pace of Twitter. Scoop.it feels like a cross between Google Reader, Twitter, and a blog. With Scoop.it, you choose a topic unique to you and identify keywords pertaining to your topic. You look through the harvested blog posts and articles and select the ones you want to be part of your Scoop.it page by clicking on ‘Scoop.it’ on the chosen post. This process is referred to by Scoop.it as curating.  My topic is Future of Learning.  Have a look and see what you think!

Screenshot of Future of Learning on Scoop.it

I’ve found that I must wade through and discard lots of posts I don’t want on my page. Because my keywords include “podcast” and “ebook,” I get many posts advertising particular ebooks and podcasts. But amongst the dross there is much gold, discovered much more quickly and easily than I could have done without such a tool.

When I select a post for the page, I can also select to tweet it and/or put it on Facebook. I noticed that because I was tweeting my choices, my Twitter followers began to join Scoop.it and follow my topic. Best of all, Scoop.it allows comments on my chosen posts. Currently, on one of these posts with comments, I am arguing with Alan Cann about whether “one trick pony” e-readers will endure against the all-singing-all-dancing iPad. This is where Scoop.it emulates aspects of blogging. I can also pull my blog posts into my Scoop.it topic – I haven’t set that up but I will.

I’ve decided that I still need to blog, because I still need to compose my thoughts and put them into writing and commit them to the internet – the duty of every digital scholar. I will not allow Scoop.it to encourage me to become digitally lazy.

Terese Bird, Learning Technologist

Does technology always help us to learn?

My sat-nav certainly doesn’t help me to learn about navigation.  Whereas I would ponder over maps, comparing the merits and weaknesses of various routes, I now type in postcode and follow the directions almost without interest in the route it’s commanding me to follow.

I used to be able to do mental arithmetic.  I suppose I’m not too bad at it now.  But I wonder if calculators have hindered our ability to convert litres per kilometre to miles per gallon in our head.  I suspect it might be the case.

And using word processors has not helped my ability to spell, although my trpyings improved.

Cutting and pasting may not help me learn much either.

I get the feeling that there are occasions in which technology helps us to learn about technology and may actually distract us from deeper learning.  If I ask my students to write a blog, when they could quite happily submit their work as a word processor file, then does that help their learning? They would learn about blogging I suppose.

I remember being taught how to use a phone – that might betray my age.  However, I never really considered that I was interacting with the phone – I was interacting with the person on the other end of the line.

If we’re using technology to facilitate learning interactions, we might need to beware of the technology getting in the way. When it’s used appropriately however, it seems to be able to transform learning. I guess that depends on who’s learning (e.g. their ability to use a phone) as well as what they’re learning.

So there’s a lot to learn in how to learn using technology…

 

Professor John Fothergill

Understanding lecture capture

Yesterday (16 June) I travelled to Queen Mary, University of London, to attend a one-day event called ´Lecture capture – doing it well and at scale´put on by the Association for Learning Technology (ALT).  

As someone who knew virtually nothing about either the technology or pedagogy behind LC, I found the day to be tremendously useful.

In the morning session, Eoin McDonnell and Kris Roger – both senior learning technologists – told us about their experiences of scaling up LC at Queen Mary and LSE respectively, and I heard about some unfamiliar technology such as Echo360.  From an academic perspective, Neil Berry of the Department of Chemistry, University of Liverpool, outlined a HEA-funded LC project that was having a significant impact there.

One of the revelations of the day was provided by Dr Marco Zennaro and Dr Enrique Canessa of the International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP). The centre had commissioned a bespoke, open source, automated LC system called openEyA. Even taking into account my ignorance of LC, the demonstration seemed to show a very powerful and customisable application. And the fact that EyA (Enhance your Audience) is free and runs on Linux’s Ubuntu OS (itself open source) makes it a very attractive option, at least for a pilot study of LC. A decent HD webcam and a laptop with a good external mic is all that’s needed to capture the lecture. Thus far, ICTP have available over 7,000 lectures to watch.   

The EyA interface showing the video screen, snapshot and zoom windows

The EyA interface showing the video screen, snapshot and zoom windows

In the afternoon session, Juliet Hinrichsen and Amanda Hardy told us about their experiences of setting up LC at Coventry University, and pointed us towards the excellent resources hosted at JISC-funded ELTAC (Support for Lecture Capture) website. These are a must for any HEI thinking of going down the LC road.

The pedagogical justification for LC was provided by John Conway (Imperial College London) and Clive Young (UCL). Admittedly a whistle-stop tour, they nevertheless managed to convey enough in 20 minutes to convince me of the efficacy of video in teaching and learning (of which LC is simply a part). Like me, John and Clive are members of the ViTAL (video in teaching and learning) special interest group.

Intellectual property rights in LC was covered by Graham McElearney in the final session, but I was unable to attend this because of train connections.

It is a reflection of the great service offered by Seb and everyone else at ALT that the need for this event was established by following discussions in the Members List some months ago. In the end, the event was oversubscribed.

I learned many things on the day. For example, lecture capture might refer to audio only, or audio with a screen cast, or a fully videoed lecture hall podium that captures the lecturer, blackboard, PowerPoint slides, etc.

But one thing that came over very clearly from all the presenters was that students love captured lectures – and are demanding more. No one could point to a decline in attendance in lectures. Rather, the students were being highly discerning in choosing which part of a lecture to watch again, and found them particularly useful as revision aids.

Simon Kear

Keeper of the Media Zoo

Confessions of a PhD Student (6): ˝I hate summarizing months of hard work to a 15-minute presentation˝

Recently, I had to prepare a presentation about my pilot study. It took me one year to do this project, one year to obtain an adequate overview of the literature in my field, take a theoretical stance, plan my research[1], fulfill the ethical requirements, find a participating organization, apply the instruments, analyze the data, determine the conclusions and write it all up.

During this time, I had to deal with academic and personal issues. It was a tough (but satisfying) job.

Summarizing all of it to make it fit a 15-minute presentation was a tough (and not so satisfying) job.

There is so much I would like to say! I read so much! I had to overcome so many challenges! I found so much interesting data! I have so many questions for future research!

I know, I know. Synthetizing is a skill that all researchers should have. Not everyone in the audience is interested in all the little details. Some (most?) just want to learn the key points. I understand. I am the same when it comes to topics that do not relate to my main interests.

I did manage to condense my work. I just did not like doing it.

– Brenda Padilla


[1] If you read my fourth confession, you will know more about my pilot study and how I did it… without really knowing what I was doing. But it was great. I’m not complaining.

Kindling

Some years ago, I was surprised to discover that anyone could resell their books on Amazon. (Until then, I assumed Amazon was only available to businesses.) Two things happened as a result of this revelation:

1)      I became much more sceptical about buying books not sold by Amazon itself
2)      I started selling my own second hand books

Then came eBooks, and the Amazon Kindle store. My first assumption went along the lines of “well, you can’t sell second-hand eBooks, so everything here must by sold by Amazon”. Right? Of course not. I soon discovered that anyone can sell any text on the Amazon Kindle store.

So again, my perception of the store’s reliability dropped, albeit for a different reason.

It strikes me that virtual worlds suffer from the same kind of problem, only in reverse. When the first contemporary public virtual world (Second Life) was launched, anyone could create their view of a desirable world. And thousands did. Some creations were beautiful, some were downright weird. The press, obviously, couldn’t resist poking fun at some of the public spectacles.

Given time, the virtual world “publishers” came along and created spaces intended to be useful to large numbers of people (rather than being one personal idea of a useful world), and using evidence-based design. There are many such places now; in our case, it’a a laboratory for teaching and learning laboratory skills in genetics.

Now that stories of weird goings-on in virtual worlds are yesterday’s news, virtual worlds appear to have “had their day”, but this is not so, they have merely “had their 15 minutes of fame“. Many virtual worlds are now available, some now a good alternative to Second Life, and many organisations are developing successful educational and other professional spaces.

If the Kindle was meant as kindling for eBooks, Second Life has done the same for virtual worlds. I’m looking forward to seeing both become the roaring success they deserve.

Paul Rudman, BDRA

Northampton TIGERS – it’s a wrap!

The interprofessional team on set.

As part of TIGER (Transforming Interprofessional Groups Through Educational Resources) Paramedic science and midwifery health professionals at the University of Northampton have joined forces with the police in the School of Social Science and academics and students from the School of the Arts to develop a new interprofessional learning resource.

Initially academics from health and social science met and agreed it would be really helpful to develop some interprofessional learning resources that focussed on situations where these three professionals found themselves working together. Interprofessional education has been an important part of health education at the university for ten years with a growing number of professions becoming involved. There has been much discussion about the police being involved in some interprofessional learning with recognition that new resources would have to be developed to effectively meet the needs of specific groups of students. At the CAIPE (Centre for advancement of Interprofessional Education) corporate forum, held at Leicester University in March 2011, the plans for this work were presented and there is some interest in this resource from the interprofessional education community.

Over some months a scenario was developed based on a real case of domestic violence involving a young pregnant woman with some amendments to ensure anonymity and to highlight interprofessional learning opportunities. Initial thoughts were that students could role play, this was discarded as we felt students would focus on the role rather than interprofessional learning. We then thought actors could role play with students observing and then facilitated discussion however it was felt this would be difficult to replicate and may difficult to organise as a regular event. It was agreed to ask acting students to play the role and we would film this giving us a resource that we could reuse with different groups of students with relative ease. This was where it really got interesting as the performing arts tutor began to work with us and the students, auditions were held on 13th May, the actors cast and filming set for 20th May.

On 20th May, acting, paramedic, police and midwifery professionals were at the ‘scene of crime’ house used for police training in Northampton with 2 police students and 8 acting students. We (health) had turned up with our Flip cameras thinking we would just point and film and be finished by lunchtime – not to be the case! Within an hour one of the Arts tutors had borrowed some equipment to make a broadcast quality film. We spent the whole day drawing storyboards, rehearsing and filming with the acting tutors directing the filming, with students operating the film equipment. Students put great effort into their acting roles with health and police professionals offering advice and guidance on the authenticity of their professional representation.

Why have I blogged this? Everyone involved enjoyed and benefitted from this experience and while our original aim was to develop resources for interprofessional learning what happened was that as a team we demonstrated effective interprofessional working and learning. There was great sharing of skills and expertise, definite learning with, from and about each other and the outcome benefitted from this. I learned about filming, the limitations of Flip, the benefits of having the right equipment and also importantly having someone with the knowledge and expertise required for the job. I also learned that every room has its own sound!

The film is currently being edited and it will be available as an open educational resource (OER) in the TIGER repository later this summer.

Key words: interprofessional education, TIGER, open educational resources (OERs), ukoer

Ali Ewing

Confessions of a PhD Student (5): ˝I am a nerd˝

I have always liked to read, to learn and to question. I would rather discuss a crazy theory about the universe than talk about my day.  I can stay home a Friday night just because the book I am reading is too interesting to put down. I love doing small experiments to understand how things work.

During my life, more than once I have been called nerd, geek, bookworm and many others. When I was younger that used to worry me. Those names made me feel there was something wrong with me.

A couple of days ago I was in the living room with my flatmate. We had both our computers on. I was sitting at the table. He was on the couch. Instead of talking, I sent him a message via Facebook… And then it hit me: I am a nerd and a geek and everything else.

I actually reached this conclusion when I was in high school. The day I decided that instead of rejecting my nerdiness I would embrace it, I was happier. Later, in university, I got a group of friends that shared my craving for knowledge and my interest in studying. We called ourselves “the nerds” (“las ñoñas”).

This is a brick my friends and I had engraved and put in one of the paths of my university in Mexico. It reads “Fuimos, somos y seremos ñoñas”, meaning “We were, we are, and we will be nerds”.

Now that I am doing a PhD, I think that I wouldn’t be successful if I weren’t a nerd. The word can have a negative connotation, but if it implies that I like to study and to learn, I don’t care. I love doing my research. I get excited when I discover new frameworks to guide my study. I have read lots of articles about my topic, and the more I read, the more I want to keep on reading.

I am a nerd… and I am proud of it.

– Brenda Padilla

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 503 other followers

%d bloggers like this: