From ALT-C 2009 with new dreams of the future

ALT-C has come and gone, but the issues and challenges addressed at the conference will remain with us for some time to come i.e. how we harness technology to inform our educational futures. So what did I learn from this august conference? A lot, which I cannot recount in this short blog. However there was a few which struck me as pertinent if we are to dream new dreams and change the future of higher education for the better.

Michael Wesch spoke about the crisis of significance and pointed out that we need to move beyond incremental dreams focused on past trends, to radical dreams based on new and innovative ideas. Indeed I cannot but agree with him that we need to advance from making people “knowledgeable” to making people “knowledge-able”.

Martin Bean spoke about innovative skepticism and the crisis of relevance in Higher Education and called for moving Higher Education into the place where people want to acquire their learning experience by breaking down the barriers between the formal and the informal. To him this calls for agile, efficient and connected learning systems; making change possible through people, process and technology; moving away from content-centric to people-centric education. Martin noted that people are sick and tired of education “done to me” and rather want education “for me”.

Terry Anderson made a strong case for the “Open Scholar”. Being a recent convert to Open Educational Resources (OER), the notion of the “Open Scholar” struck a strong cord with me. Terry made the point that education for the elite is no longer sufficient for planetary survival. He contended that ideas don’t gain value unless exposed to the world. Networks of practice as opposed to communities of practice have the potential to bring about the change we want in our educational futures. To him personal and social relevance should be the basis for motivating new learners.

So where do we in BDRA stand in relation to these different dreams regarding the future of education. How does our research address questions around the crisis of significance and resolve the challenges faced by Higher Education? How do we envision a future of “Open scholarship”, “Open learning”, “Open Pedagogy”, and an “Open society”? The answer may lie not just in changing academic and technical skills but rather in how we change world views on education and institutional cultures that are receptive to new dreams and therefore new learning futures.

Samuel Nikoi (25 September 2009)

About these ads
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 640 other followers

%d bloggers like this: